Over the past 70 years a wide range of myths s have grown up around the Auxiliary Units and these have become fossilised in the historical record. The problem is  not least on internet sites, where descriptions are 'cut and pasted' from one account to the next

The Auxiliary Units are popularly labelled as the  'British Resistance Organisation' or a 'last ditch' movement. Virtually any media story will automatically describe them as such. This is a fundamentally flawed concept – which is not to downplay in any way the  contribution to defending the country that its volunteers were prepared to make.   A distinction must be made between organisations designed to operate in a military capacity during an active anti-invasion campaign and those who would mount resistance after occupation.  This distinction was explained in Fighting Nazi Occupation (2015), where the history of the Auxiliary Units is presented in detail,  and was  a theme returned to in To The Last Man (2019) and Secret Warriors (forthcoming 2020/1)

Sometimes the Auxiliary Units are even claimed to be the first 'resistance' movement that was created before a Nazi invasion of that country. This  ignores the much earlier plans for Czech and Polish resistance,  which provided inspirations for  Section D of SIS and MI(R). D for Destruction: forerunner of SOE (2017) shows how the 'blueprint' for the multi-layered British resistance and guerrilla system relied heavily on precedents set in Poland and Czechoslovakia, as well as planning for the occupation of, among other countries, Norway and Greece. 

The founders of the Auxiliary Units, Colin Gubbins and Peter Wilkinson, were both clear that the organisation was only intended as a short-term expedient to hinder the movement of the invasion army away from the coast (it was not a national organisation). The Auxiliary Units were a military expedient to operate as commandos within what was anticipated to be a month-long campaign, rather than an attempt to create an organised resistance organisation to operate under enemy occupation. Gubbins concluded that the Auxiliary Units were 'designed, trained and prepared for a particular and imminent crisis: that was their specialist role.’ He added, ‘We were expendable. We were a bonus, that’s all.’ They were not, therefore, the 'last ditch' of Britain's defence by the simple fact that they were intended to support a still active British field army - buying valuable time for the latter to regroup and, in General Thorne's view at least,  to cover the flanks of a British counter-attack. Their role in relation to any resistance organisation was discussed - and dismissed - at the time, not least because they had been founded as a direct response to the rushed efforts of Section D of SIS to create a  civilian guerrilla organisation.   


An on-line article explaining the development of the mythology that gave rise to the mistaken assumption that the romanticised Auxiliary Units were a 'Resistance' organisation


Quotes from tose involved in the formation of the Auxiliary Units that explains the purpose of the organisation.

Wireless sets used by GHQ Auxiliary Units. and related clandestine wireless sets.


Ground-breaking  study of  the complex network of secret organisations designed to combat any Nazi invasion of Britain The book contains the most detailed modern analysis  of the organisation of the GHQ Auxiliary Units and their Special Duties Branch, based on newly-released documents in The National Archives.


Published in 2015 by Pen & Sword

  • Facebook