GHQ AUXILIARY UNITS
Over the past 70 years a wide range of myths s have grown up around the Auxiliary Units and these have become fossilised in the historical recording have taken on an emotional attachment. The problem is not least on internet sites, where descriptions are 'cut and pasted' from one account to the next
The Auxiliary Units are popularly labelled as the 'British Resistance Organisation' or a 'last ditch' movement. Virtually any media story will automatically describe them as such. This is a fundamentally flawed concept – which is not to downplay in any way the contribution to defending the country that its volunteers were prepared to make. A distinction must be made between organisations designed to operate in a military capacity during an active anti-invasion campaign and those who would mount resistance after occupation. This distinction was explained in Fighting Nazi Occupation (2015), where the history of the Auxiliary Units is presented in detail, and was a theme returned to in To The Last Man (2019) and Secret Warriors (forthcoming 2020/1)
Sometimes the Auxiliary Units are even claimed to be the first 'resistance' movement that was created before a Nazi invasion of that country. This nationalist perspective ignores the much earlier plans for Czech and Polish resistance, which provided inspirations for Section D of SIS and MI(R). D for Destruction: forerunner of SOE (2017) shows how the 'blueprint' for the multi-layered British resistance and guerrilla system relied heavily on precedents set in Poland and Czechoslovakia, as well as planning for the occupation of, among other countries, Norway and Greece.
The founders of the Auxiliary Units, Colin Gubbins and Peter Wilkinson, were both clear that the organisation was only intended as a short-term expedient to hinder the movement of the invasion army away from the coast (it was not a national organisation). The Auxiliary Units were a military expedient to operate as uniformed commandos within what was anticipated to be a month-long campaign, rather than an attempt to create an organised resistance organisation to operate under enemy occupation. Gubbins concluded that the Auxiliary Units were 'designed, trained and prepared for a particular and imminent crisis: that was their specialist role.’ He added, ‘We were expendable. We were a bonus, that’s all.’ They were not, therefore, the 'last ditch' of Britain's defence by the simple fact that they were intended to support a still active British field army - buying valuable time for the latter to regroup and, in General Thorne's view at least, to cover the flanks of a British counter-attack. Their role in relation to any resistance organisation was discussed - and dismissed - at the time, not least because they had been founded as a direct response to the rushed efforts of Section D of SIS to create a civilian guerrilla organisation.
An on-line article explaining the development of the mythology that gave rise to the mistaken assumption that the romanticised Auxiliary Units were the 'British Resistance Organisation'.
Quotes from tose involved in the formation of the Auxiliary Units that explains the purpose of the organisation.
SEE ALSO ...
FIGHTING NAZI OCCUPATION: BRITISH RESISTANCE IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR
Ground-breaking study of the complex network of secret organisations designed to combat any Nazi invasion of Britain The book contains the most detailed modern analysis of the organisation of the GHQ Auxiliary Units and their Special Duties Branch, based on newly-released documents in The National Archives.
Published in 2015 by Pen & Sword
TO THE LAST MAN: THE HOME GUARD IN WAR AND POPULAR CULTURE
Chapter Four - 'The Secret Home Guard' builds on 'Myth and Reality' in discussing the role of the Auxiliary Units Operational patrols.
Published in 2019 by Pen & Sword
THE MILITARY INTELLIGENCE (RESEARCH) DEPARTMENT
IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR
Contains a new appraisal of the role of MI(R) and Colin Gubbins in the formation of the Auxiliary Units.
To be published by Pen & Sword in late 2020/21